| Construction
Loans
by Robert J. Abalos, Esq.
from investinginland.com
How to get construction loans is a frequent question I'm asked
by visitors to my website at www.investinginland.com. So here
is some advice on how to deal with the banks and get the money
you need to build on your land.
What are Construction Loans?
To be simple about it, construction loans are any loan that
funds the construction, development, modernization, rehabilitation,
or renovation of a real estate project. Construction loans
are used to develop raw land and also improve or rehab an
existing building.
Construction loans by definition are short-term loans that
only exist during the period of construction. Lenders and
developers alike expect that these loans will be replaced
by permanent financing at the end of the project. Since constructions
loans are meant to be "taken out" by other financing,
these newer and more permanent loans are often called "take-out"
loans. It is very common to hear developers looking for take-out
financing.
Construction loan costs are usually fair to developers. Obviously
the rate your lender charges depends on how good your credit
is, the viability of your project, and other practical considerations,
but a fair rule of thumb would be for the interest rate to
be 4-5% above the prevailing prime rate at the time the loan
is written. The same fairness applies to construction loan
LTV ratios. Many lenders require LTVs at around 70-75% but
it is quite common for some to lend up to or beyond 100% for
reasons that will be explained later.
Most construction loans are established as new first mortgages
with a lien attached to the property or land under development.
If there is existing financing on the property, the lender
almost always requires the current lienholders to subordinate
in order to make the construction loan. While this may seem
unfair, two reason dictate why it is not. First, the construction
loan is short-term financing and will be replaced by permanent
financing that will likely incorporate the existing liens
into a new take-out loan. Therefore it is in the current lienholder's
interest to subordinate, they will get paid off faster that
way. Plus, the extension of construction loan credit adds
security to the current lienholders by raising the value of
their collateral. Owning a mortgage secured by raw land is
okay, but having the same mortgage secured by raw land plus
a finished building is better. So while the current lienholders
may be pushed down one position in the priority order after
subordination, they actually have better security for repayment
than before.
Often construction loans work on a disbursement schedule,
in other words, you do not get the full amount of the loan
at one time and the capital is released in stages. Lenders
differ widely about what they require. Some have a "three/thirds"
schedule, or releasing 1/3 of the proceeds when building framing
is complete, another 1/3 when the building is "tight"
or waterproof and complete with rough plumbing and electrical
work done, and the final 1/3 when the building or project
is finished and a certificate of occupancy issued. Other lenders
use a house-by-house schedule, for example, if you are building
ten houses on some land they will release 1/10th of the funds
as you complete each home. These money releases operate on
what are called "draw schedules" and even four,
five, six or more separate draws are common. Lenders will
specify in writing what specific work needs to be done to
qualify for a draw and will require inspection to prove the
work is done for each draw before releasing any money. The
cost of these inspections is paid for, you guessed it, by
the mortgagor although it is common for these costs to be
rolled into the permanent take-out loan.
If you are developing some land where you will be building
a number of homes or housing units on spec or will be directly
selling some building lots to other developers, a lender will
usually require that you get a commitment letter from another
lender (if they're not interested) for permanent take-out
financing BEFORE they will write the construction loan. This
is quite fair to both the construction lender and developer,
although many builders do not see it that way. Since a construction
loan is short-term, the lender making it wants reassurance
that they will be paid off quickly before making the loan.
As you might have guessed, this is called a take-out commitment.
When building lots or new houses are sold on property where
a construction loan lien exists, part of the construction
lien is released when title to these sales is transferred
and new permanent financing received from the new lot or homeowners
repays the construction loan. But what if the building lots
or new homes do not sell as planned and the developer is stuck
with many still in inventory when the construction loan's
term expires? This is where the take-out commitment protects
the construction loan lender. The developer's new permanent
take-out financing pays off the construction loan on whatever
units or lots remain unsold and they remain as security for
the take-out mortgagee.
Construction Loan Tricks-of-the-Trade
First, when applying for construction loans try to have your
take-out commitment already in hand. Lenders love when they
see another lender already backing them up on a deal in case
things don't go as planned.
Second, sell the construction loan from the lender's perspective
and not from your own. Lenders want these loans to be SHORT
and FULLY SECURED. That means work out the shortest realistic
timetable for your project and pre-arrange subordination agreements
if you need to do so. Provide lenders the same information
you would provide equity investors. If a project is viable
and will make money, lenders will likely fund it. If the project
is marginal or adds inventory to an already glutted market,
you sales job is much tougher.
Third, when you are dealing with a lender anxious to make
construction loans, push the LTV issue all the way to the
max. Banks are like all other businesses, sometimes they run
"sales" and are more likely to write loans than
at other times. Management of banks and lenders is no different
from selling hamburgers or TV sets sometimes. While all lenders
will have a written policy on LTV ratios for construction
loans (or at least claim they do), the key place you can push
as a developer is loan-to-value of what? Is it the value of
the current collateral that is at issue or the future collateral
once construction is completed?
Take, for example, this situation. Dave Developer buys a
$200,000 piece of land and wants to build an apartment building.
He goes to a bank where the policy is to write construction
loans with 80% LTV ratios. His costs in addition to an estimated
$800,000 construction budget are these:
$20,000 for zoning approval
$75,000 in soft development costs
$75,000 in construction loan interest
Dave does not want a loan of $800,000, or the actual amount
of his construction budget. This is what a lender will likely
offer him, after all, the loan is for construction, right?
But Dave can make the clever argument successfully that the
real cost of this development is $1,170,000 and therefore
the bank could easily loan him $936,000, or a conservative
80% LTV on the value of the finished project's cost.
But Dave can even go further. What if he argues that the
LTV ratio should be applied against the actual market value
of the finished building? Here he proves the finished apartment
building would be worth $1.5 million so an 80% LTV loan would
be $1.2 million.
Of course, all this would depend on Dave's prior relationship
with this lender, his credit history, the bank's assessment
of this project, and other factors but he would be absolutely
for attempting to cash out before the project is finished
and so should you when banks are hungry to make these loans.
Fourth, try to structure your construction loans as lines
of credit rather than draw down loans. Draw downs are time
consuming and frustrating sometimes. What if an inspector
can't get to a job site for a week but your subcontractor
needs to be paid TODAY? What if there is a controversy on
whether an item is completed or finished? Relying upon banks
to release funds on time is often like getting your brother-in-law
to repay his debts to you. You want to exert some pressure,
but how? You need the long-term relationship just as much
as you need the money. Many lenders will use the line of credit
concept where you can draw funds as needed if your credit
is good and your experience as a developer is sound. It's
worth paying a half-percent extra on the loan or a point to
work out a credit line rather than having to deal with draw
downs.
Lastly, AVOID playing draw down games with your contractors
and subs. It is a well established and in my opinion highly
unethical technique to keep pushing the payments due to contractors
and subs back beyond the draw down payment schedule in order
to keep a larger than projected amount of cash in your pocket.
For example, if 1/3 of the funds are to be paid when framing
is complete, promising to pay your framers and foundation
contractors when the building is tight (the second 2/3 draw
down) means that they are waiting to be paid for completed
work while the bank's cash to pay them remains in your checking
account. I've seen some developers so skilled at playing this
game that their foundation and framer contractors were paid
by the security deposits received from tenants on the finished
building! Treating your builders badly is a recipe for the
inevitable mechanic's lien. Stick to your payment schedule
as closely as possible. If you have the bank's cash, use it.
Your contractors and subs will remember how you treat them
on current projects and determine how they will treat you
on future ones.
The Bottom Line on Construction Loans
Construction loans are actually much easier to get than people
often think. They are short-term loans so the lender has a
limited risk. With careful project planning, it is quite simple
to get one even if your credit is not perfect.
As my Investing in Land Home Study Course teaches, land owned
free-and-clear is a blessing to developers and is the most
powerful asset in their possession. Construction loan lenders
love free-and-clear land, they often will finance construction
just based on the value of the land itself. Plus there is
no subordination issue when you own the land without other
liens. The result is that if you can acquire free land like
my Course teaches, you virtually guarantee construction of
something on it at little or no additional cost to you, making
the rental income or capital gains upon resale of this project
pure profit in your wallet.
The bottom line is realize that construction loans represent
only one way of building on land. Cash is cash and you can
use equity capital, loans on other collateral you own, or
about three dozen other cash sources as a way of paying for
construction. You do not have to get a construction loan to
do construction. My advice is that when construction loan
financing is easy to get, use it and use it often. But when
the banks and lenders are being tightfisted towards these
loans, use capital from other sources. You don't need to beat
your head against some banker's desk to get a construction
loan when really any other source of cash will do just fine.
|